Hardtodigest food

I went to the film, it can be said by accident. The cast intrigued me. The presence of such names as Weaver, Hurt or Whitaker does their job. The idea itself also seemed good. Presenting the assassination of the US President from eight different perspectives - it must be "something" - I thought. However it is not. From the beginning, the work seems very schematic. The president arrives, intends to speak, but falls shot. This is just the beginning of the whole story. Ahead of us to see it from the perspective of several people - starting with random people, through the president himself, ending with terrorists. Despite the specific pattern, it still seems interesting and intriguing. "8 parts of truth" is a picture that we are to discover gradually, learning a little bit of everything. A real puzzle.

However, is it interesting? Watching the same scenes several times can become difficult to digest. And so it really happens. After watching the story from the perspective of another person - I wanted to leave the cinema. The only thing that stopped me was that "something" would happen and the action was everywhere. Because the action is what works to the plus of the whole work. However, nothing surprised.

Everything ends with a happy ending. Bad terrorists lose, the good president and his loyal "comrades" win. Well-worn and idiotic. Travis had an idea to create something intriguing and revealing that failed. Instead, another action movie was made, average and tedious.

Only for fans of sensations who are not afraid of watching similar scenes several times. top streaming sites So sit in the armchair, "turn off" gray cells and watch.



I rate the film 4/10 - I was expecting something more ..